MAN CREATED GOD

The 

Universe

think of it in terms of

energy, frequency and vibration

From its beginning ...

when Earth and Moon were ready...

1.5m years in a few seconds

Now lets pick one of those gods

The Volcano God

In the north of a dry, vast land 

called Midian

which is today the  province of Medina in Saudi Arabia,

there is the low volcano

"Hala´l  Badr"

Numbers of basalt streams and tracks of eruptions 

pull through the scanty area. The most imposing crater, 

the 170 metres high volcano Hala´l Badr 

gapes on a 1600 metre high mesa in Saudi Arabia.

About 3500 years ago, this volcano was active.

Moses, the first author of the Old Testament, wrote:

Exodus 16. "On the morning of the third day there was thunder and lightning, with a thick cloud over the mountain, and a very loud trumpet blast. Everyone in the camp trembled. 17 Then Moses led the people out of the camp to meet with God, and they stood at the foot of the mountain. 18 Mount Sinai was covered with smoke, because the Lord descended on it in fire. The smoke billowed up from it like smoke from a furnace, and the whole mountain[b] trembled violently. 19 As the sound of the trumpet grew louder and louder, Moses spoke and the voice of God answered him.[c]

By taking the Bible literally, 
(like the british physician Sir Colin Humphreys, Cambridge recommends)

the text sounds like an volcanic eruption. 

Also Theologist Margot Käßmann and 
the swiss Scientist in Egyptology Dr. Othmar Keel
are supporters of the "Crater-Theory"

Apperantly mount Sinai lays not in Midian.

Moses went twice to Midian to meet  his god,

"... the god of his fathers."

The Shasu

ln Midian lived a tribe of herdsmen, 

known as the "Shasu" or "Sandwanderers" - 

as the Egyptians used to call them, but maybe it means just "nomad" or "bedouin".

There is evidence, that the clan was trading their sheeps and goats till palastine.

The Shasu wearing skirts with dangling tassels. 

They were armed with spears, crooked daggers and boomerangs.

On a stonerelief, they are shown with cut off foreskins.

In a papyrus the Shasu were described as robbers:

"The narrow path is dangerous because Shasu do itself behind the bushes hiding"

In another papyrus describes them: "they have fierce faces and they are hostile"

The Shasu robbed the egyptian caravans on their way to the Jemenites - No wonder that the Pharao Amenhotep (Amenophis III)  got pissed off about the Sandwanderers. 

So the Egyptians captured some of the Shasu 

and enslaved them.  

The Shasu were almost always looked upon as enemies of the Egyptians. For example, at the famous Battle of Kadesh in ca. 1275 BC, there were Shasu soldiers who were allies of the Hitites against Rameses II. It is likely that the Egyptians classified all of the Edomites, Ammonites Amalekites and Hapiru as Shasu. 

Was the real Moses a Schasu?




Whether Moses himself was a Schasu, nobody still knows how to say. It is not clear sometimes whether the biblical prophet lived generally one day. clear is only that the Bible stores a deep recollection: And this connects the roots of the Israelites with shepherd's people which lived near the Red Sea. Simplisticly one could express the new God's formula,therefore, so:

At the beginning was the fire

In Soleb, Sudan:

This temple was built under 

the reign of Pharao Amenophis III.

The below table displays a cast (reversed) 

The carved hieroglyphs says: 

"land of the Schasu YHW" 

(the last part is missing)

This is the first mention of "YHW " 

Now think: There are halfnomadic tribes roving in an arid and rocky area, in the Bronze-Age. How they would explain an active volcano other then as a god?. They gave this god a name - YHWH.

Jahweh, a tribal god.

- it is man-made -

and so are all religions

see, here's the problem with that.

There are a crap ton of religions, 

and many of them have a similar 

"believe in my god 

or my god will spank you when you die" rule.

None of these religions are any more proven than the others,

 meaning that one doesn't really know 

which of these spankings they can avoid 

by selective worship, 

so I would either have to worship ALL gods, 

or just take my chances with none. 

Then of course, 

most of these gods are mutually exclusive, 

meaning they get upset if you are 

also trying to appease a different god, so really

 I would have to pick one of them anyway.

In that case, I'll pick the one where there is no spanking, 

and I get to live my life without any outdated code of conduct.

JESUS IS A MYTH

Geologist claims 

Jesus was married and had a son.

Expert says he has proof son of God was buried in family tomb along with wife Mary and his brother
Geologist ran 150 chemical test on ossuaries and Jesus Family Tomb.
Claims chemical signature proves James Ossuary was at Jerusalem site.

Chalk box bears iscription "James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus"
Find suggests Jesus fathered a child and was married.

First published by SARAH GRIFFITHS FOR MAILONLINE

PUBLISHED: 10:06 GMT, 7 April 2015 | UPDATED: 15:31 GMT, 7 April 2015

An Israeli geologist claims he has ‘confirmed’ the existence and authenticity of a tomb belonging to Jesus and his son in Jerusalem.

After extensive chemical tests, Dr Arye Shimron says he has linked the James Ossuary – a 1st-century chalk box that some believe hold the bones of Jesus' brother – to the long disputed ‘Jesus Family tomb’ in the city’s East Talpiot neighbourhood.

The research could have enormous ramifications as it suggests that Jesus was married, fathered a child and that a physical resurrection did not take place.

After running 150 chemical tests, an expert claims to have linked the James Ossuary (pictured) – a 1st-century chalk box that was used for containing the bones of the dead – to the long disputed ‘Jesus Family tomb’ in the city’s East Talpiot neighbourhood

According to geoarcheologist Dr Shimron, the 'son of God' was buried with nine other people, including ‘Judah, son of Jesus’ and his wife, named Mary.

Dr Shimron’s work has renewed controversy over the Talpiot tomb, which was discovered in 1980 and dates back to the Second Temple period and the time of Jesus,The Jerusalem Post reported.

Bones were discovered inside ossuaries, including one that bore the inscription, ‘Jesus, son of Joseph'.

Others included the names Maria, Joseph, Mary, Yose, Matthew and most controversially, ‘Judah, son of Jesus’.

Joseph, Mary and Jesus were all common names at the time and a statistician from the University of Toronto said that they each made up eight per cent of the population.

However, a very small percentage would have had the same family name combination as described in the Bible.

Dr Shimron’s work has renewed the controversy over the Talpiot tomb, which was found in 1980 and dates back to the Second Temple period and the time of Jesus (a portrait is pictured)

The long-disputed long disputed ‘Jesus Family tomb’ in the city’s East Talpiot neighbourhood (marked) and is now sealed beneath a concrete slab after building work took place some years ago

Probing this connection, Dr Shimron and documentary maker Simcha Jacobovici looked closer at the ossuaries, including the James Ossuary, which is held by a private owner and bears the inscription, ‘James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus’.

WHAT IS THE JAMES OSSUARY? 

The James Ossuary is a first century chalk example of a box that was used to hold the bones of the dead.

But it stands out because it bears the inscription 'James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus' on one side.

The inscription is considered significant because it may provide archaeological evidence of Jesus,

The existence of the ossuary was announced in 2002, but its authenticity was immediately challenged.

The box's owner was charged with forging part of the inscription and while he was found innocent seven years later, the judge said the acquittal 'does not mean that the inscription on the ossuary is authentic or that it was written 2,000 years ago'.

Now, Dr Shimron claims the chemical signature on the ‘crust’ of the box matches that of a tomb in Jerusalem known as the ‘Jesus Family tomb’ where other ossuaries were found bearing the names of Jesus and Mary as well as ‘Judah, son of Jesus’.

The owner of the ossuary, Oded Golan, was accused of forging the inscription shortly after its discovery by an academic from the Sorbonne in Paris, but he was later found innocent.

Other experts and archaeologists have rejected the claim that the Jerusalem tomb is connected with Jesus at all.

Recently Dr Shimron gained access to the James Ossuary and scraped beneath the box's patina, the layer that forms on metal over time.

He ran around 150 tests on the chemistry of samples from 25 different ossuaries – 15 of which were from unrelated tombs – and found that traces of magnesium, iron and silicon from the James Ossuary matched the chemical signature of Talpiot tomb.

The Talpiot ossuaries were covered in a thick layer of ‘Rendzina’ soil, which is characteristic of the hills of East Jerusalem when they were found and has a unique chemistry.

Dr Shimron worked from the assumption that an earthquake of 363AD flooded the tomb with soil and mud to cover the ossuaries, effectively forming a vacuum and freezing them in time.

Soil that seeped into the box matched that found in the Talpiot ossuaries, indicating that it had lain for years alongside others in the ‘holy’ location. 

Looking back at the moment the Talpiot tomb was discovered

Bones were discovered there in ossuaries, or chalk boxes, including one that bears the inscription, ‘Jesus, son of Joseph' with others bearing the names of Maria, Joseph, Mary, Yose, Matthew and most controversially, ‘Judah, son of Jesus’. Here an inscription that says 'Yoseph' on an ossuary
Because bones were found in the ossuaries, it could be argued that there was no bodily resurrection (portrayed in this tapestry) which is the belief of more traditional Christians, while others accept the event was spiritual

JESUS IS A MYTH 

AND WAS PROBABLY MANY PEOPLE, WRITER CLAIMS

Jesus Christ was not a real person and is probably the result of a combination of stories about several different individuals, according to a writer and leading atheist activist.

David Fitzgerald, a San Francisco based author, believes he has compiled compelling evidence that proves Jesus did not exist.

He claims there are no contemporary mentions of Jesus in historical accounts from the time when he was supposed to have lived, yet other Jewish sect leaders from the time do appear.

Jesus Christ was not a real person 

and is probably the result of a combination of stories about several different individuals, according to a writer and leading atheist activist. A mosaic of Christ is shown
He also points to discrepancies in the early gospels of Mark, Matthew and Luke, claiming these were written decades after the supposed time of Jesus.

Instead he insists the disciples of Jesus were also probably not real and their names only later attached to the gospels to lend them credence.

Speaking to MailOnline, he said: 'There is a paradox that Jesus did all these amazing things and taught all these amazing things yet no one heard of him outside his immediate cult for nearly 100 years.

'Or it means he didn't do all these things at all.
'The first gospel of Christianity appears to have been a literary allegory that were written decades after the time they portray.

'I believe that Christianity started as one of the many mystery faiths that appeared at the time where old Gods and old traditions were rebooted.

'Christianity appears to have been a Jewish mystery faith.

David Fitzgerald told MailOnline: 'There is a paradox that Jesus did all these amazing things and taught all these amazing things yet no one heard of him outside his immediate cult for nearly 100 years'. The famous statue of Christ the Redeemer in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, is shown

'By the time of Paul there appears to have been plenty of different "Lord's suppers" as he complains about the existence of other gospels and messiahs.

'It appears that early Christianity managed to take the stories from these other faiths and incorporate them into the story of Jesus.'

Mr Fitzgerald said: 'There is nothing implausible to think that Jesus was a real person, but I just don't think that he can have been a single person if he existed at all.

'We also have no mention of Jesus in other historical texts from the time. There were certainly people writing about Judea at the time like Philo of Alexandria.

'During this period there were many other messiahs and wannabe messiahs who did far less exciting things than Jesus, but all of them managed something Jesus did not - to make a dent on the historical record.

'Two billion people believe all these miracles happened yet there is no evidence they did.'


Jacobovici told The Jerusalem Post: ‘This find illustrates that the James Ossuary is authentic and the Jesus Family tomb indeed belongs to the family of Jesus of Nazareth.’

Dr Shumron told The New York Times: ‘I think I’ve got really powerful, virtually unequivocal evidence that the James ossuary spent most of its lifetime, or death time, in the Talpiot Tomb.’

The retired senior researchers of the Geological Survey of Israel, added: ‘ The evidence is beyond what I expected.’
The duo are aware that the findings could rock the Christian church, but insist the research is scientific and not theological.

Because bones were found in the ossuaries, it could be argued that there was no bodily resurrection, which is the belief of more traditional Christians, while others accept the event was spiritual.

The Talpiot tomb is now sealed under a concrete slab, while the ossuaries found there are in the hands of the Israel Antiquities Authority.

The James Ossuary is kept in a secret location by its owner, who lives in Tel Aviv.

• 
  

back 
to

A WARRIOR`S LIFE

Battlefield Slaughterhouse - HARD STUFF!!!

Genesis 1.28: Then God blessed them, and God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it; have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves on the earth."

Dominion looks then like this:

Meat should be at least something special. 

Not an everyday meal. And everybody, who eats meat, shall see at least once the whole, almost unbearable pictures, to honor and think twice, before one eats the meat of a slaughtered creature.

Because I do not agree with it how we see animals as a product for our meatconsumption!
Animals just feel as us pain and grief, sorrow and joy.
To the cows her calves is to be taken away for me nothing else as if one from a motherher child takes away! To see animals only as a product to kill because of her meat and they still under gruesome tortures, for it Iwould like to bear no more responsibility.
Besides, come with the meat consumption the greenhouse gas, the deforestation ofthe tropical woods and with it other misery and famine.
I would not like to have this any more on my plate.